I cant believe people actually believe Bush on this.
He has went back and forth on his policies on Iraq so many times, first it was WMD, when they were not found it was because of the mass graves and crap, now, he says they are only trying to maintain what the peace untill the Iraqi army can take over and american troops can leave. So what he is saying is we can't defeat the "terrorist" and we will no win this war.
If Bush's talking points were so important they justified invading another country, the US would not have sat by, with 500,000 troops in the region while sadam killed thousands of his own people whom hos father encouraged to rise up. They were not important then so why are the mass graves important now?
my opinion is Sadam was a bad person, something needed to be done about him, but were we really justified in invading? Not hardly, there are bigger bad guys out there then sadam to deal with. Bush lied about his reasons for invading Iraq, if he had real justification he would not have to lie about them.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks
Yes, US military lives were lost in Iraq, but 30 million people are making baby steps towards democracy, and that can only make the world a safer place in the long run.
|