Quote:
Originally posted by Gutterboy
What you really mean is "invents and implies things that I don't think can be derived from the constitution."
I'm sure the realization that the Supreme Court has the temerity to disagree with you on matters of Constitutional interpretation is upsetting, but thats hardly a good definition of judicial activism 
|
hey liberal, "derived" and "interpretation" are *YOUR* words not mine.
the constitution says it, or it doesn't.
You liberals like to "derive" and "interpret" the constitution. I just read it and understand it.
