Quote:
Originally posted by 12clicks
well, that WOULD be the liberals take on it.
The bill of rights LIMITS the power of the government. Therefore, a court who strikes down laws is following the constitution by limiting the power of government. an ACTIVIST court invents and implies things that aren't in the constitution.
Liberals, as we all should know, expand the power of the government. 
|
You are now contradicting conservatives, not liberals. Bush and his right wing media robots slam the "activist" courts for overturning laws that were put in place by congress. Remember, it is Bush and conservatives, not liberals, who are saying this about the Warren court. They repeatedly attack the Warren Supreme Court for overturning laws, not for not overturning them. You are not arguing with liberals, you are now disagreeing with your conservative masters. Be careful, you might get kicked out of the Rush Limbaugh fan club for this type of talk.
I'm sure you are joking about liberals and big government as well. Bush has done more to expand the power of government in 2 years than Clinton ever dreamed of in 8 years. Clinton balanced the budget, Bush broke the budget. I could go on, but I'm sure you know all of this and you're just kidding.