View Single Post
Old 08-31-2005, 04:41 PM  
EZRhino
Confirmed User
 
EZRhino's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: couch
Posts: 6,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by After Shock Media
Assuming they indeed placed sub section (e) back into the 2257/2256 rules as has been reported during the court hearings, then a soft core non explicit photo would not need 2257 documentation, which would mean no link would be required.
Sounds about right
EZRhino is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote