View Single Post
Old 08-29-2005, 09:17 AM  
mackey
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by WEG Cory
You got it. That lense costed me about $220. It lacks IS, but I have never needed IS. The Canon Optics are the same.

It is a superior lense. I will get IS in the future, but only for 100-400.
It's not that superior with all the chromatic abbreation (purple fringe, the pink/purple highlights on the white spots) going on in some of those shots, more specifically, some of the surfering shots.

I noticed a great jump in optic quality when i went from my 70-300 to my 70-200 2.8.

That should be your next lens IMO.
mackey is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote