Quote:
Originally posted by Pathfinder
Once again your point is moot. He was not charged with treason. I believe that he was not charged with treason, because the prosecutors knew that there was not anyway they could make a resonable argument for a charge of treason.
|
I've already given you the point that it's possible that he could not be charged with treason... apparently not two soldier involved in the firefight could make statements regarding him. I'm sure they had alot of other things on their minds at that point.
But now that he's admitted to treason in open court... he should be charged.
P.S. Don't give me double jeopardy... he was never charged with treason.