Originally Posted by FightThisPatent

last sentence of the article:

[jason hendeles]
"The existence of adult material online, it's not something that can be ignored," he said. "Our hope is that by being responsible there will be benefits."


what benefits? i thought the "benefit" was that it saves children from seeing the "bad stuff".

the "responsible" thing would be for ICM to push for .KIDS, charge $120/domain and have IFFOR convince PARENTS to be "responsible" and install a filter to block out stuff, as well as use a web browser that uses a "white list" of domains that is kid-safe.. including those that would have .KIDS extension.


Fight the .GREEDY!