Originally Posted by FightThisPatent

so you are saying you don't know anyone connected to IFFOR or ICM?

you can dodge behind words like "not affiliated" as we have learned from Bill Clinton when he didn't have "sexual relations with that woman"..

so, who do you know that can vouch for you as being an "adult webmaster" that runs a TGP and other stuff as you have claimed?

Lawley wanted people to "trust" them at the Internext panel, and it is particularly odd that an "adult webmaster" as you claim, is so adament about supporting .XXX in defending it at every chance in every thread.

There are certainly some webmasters who do support .XXX, but many of those reasons are financially tied and those that aren't, haven't been able to contruct any solid argument as to how it protects children.

no "adult webmaster" that i have come across would make comments as you have, especially ones about reading the bios and being "impressed". You are clearly from the mainstream.. and whether you truly are dabbling in adult or not, your motives and agendas for your consistent support does raise an eyebrow.

so until someone can vouch for you, you are stuart lawley for all intents and purposes.

i am by no means trying to discourage rational discussion, but you have not brought anything to the discussion other than trying to spin points away from .XXX, painting those that think of things that could happen as being "tin hat" wearers, and consistantly saying that .XXX is voluntary. Both jason and stewart say that phrase all the time, we already get it...

Fight the labelling!