Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent
"People who didn't understand the proposal thought it was horrible because it would actually promote the acceptability and spread of pornography," he said. "In fact, it was intended to do just the opposite."
http://www.latimes.com/business/cust...ck=1&cset=true
---------------------------------------------
Stuart ( "Cains" )... so has this attorney now joined the group of "tin foil" wears since he is talking about what could happen with .XXX? |
For a start, I'm not affiliated with the ICM registry in any way, shape or form.
The Lawyer is saying it
could happen, not it
would happen. What he's hypothesising would involve .XXX being mandatory throughout the world, which is not be proposed. What the ICM registry is proposing is a voluntary .XXX TLD, nothing more.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Connor
Maybe it's just me, but I thought I detected a British accent when you said it's voluntary. Hmmm....
|
Correct, perhaps the "Location: over the pond in London" gives it away