Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheDoc
I have read about .xxx, many times.. I have seen posts about it.
I have yet to see anything other than fear based possible "issues" that could come from this. Everyone seems more pissed that people in this industry are making money from .xxx rather than pointing out one single solid fact of why it's bad.
If something could harm my business and you have no proof, that is fear. The GOV isn't going to force us to move, the world isn't going to move, we aren't going to lose branding, we won't have to rebrand, it still won't protect children but it will offer some help... Again, sounds like people are pissed that others are making money from it rather than the real issues of why .xxx may or may not be bad.
|
If that's the conclusion you've come to then you're probably reading the wrong things...
You seem to be suggesting that we should close our eyes to all the potential problems of dot-xxx unless it can be proven that they are guarunteed to come to pass. I don't know of anyone successful who does business that way. The smart way to do business is to look at all the potential outcomes of a deal... both pro and con... and make the best decision based on likely outcomes. Your position sounds a little like Hendeles' position... which is, "trust us." If you choose to do business that way, well, best of luck with that approach. Personally when I see a proposal with an incredible potential for harm and no potential for positives, I'm against it.
BTW, which company are you with?