|
of course, some good news in there.
but it seems to me (and i'm obviously not a lawyer, just someone who reads carefully and suspects everyone and everything) that there's still a big question in there.
They haven't said a word that agrees with Sundance. So if they are continuing to maintain that secondary producers must also keep copies of the actual records - is what they're really saying:
secondary producers still have to have IDs for models in material produced prior to June 23, just that those IDs have to confirm to the pre-June 23 rules, not to the post-June 23 rules?
And remember:
"however, it is not yet known whether Kaplan?s letter will be binding as the case moves forward."
__________________
icq: 541-739-92
|