GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

nap · 08-04-2005, 08:40 AM

Thanks for the link

"You put your finger right on the question of the URLs," Cambria observed, "and your answer is on page 29617 of the Federal Register, which sets forth 28 CFR Part 75 [the new 2257 regulations], which begins on page 29607. In the section that's the Justice Department's 'Response to Public Comments on the Proposed Rule', there is the following language: 'One commenter commented that it is unclear whether a producer that provides content to a secondary producer must maintain a list of its URLs. According to the commenter, keeping such a list would be impossible, given the number of URLs and the fact that many URLs are generated dynamically, making the requirement technologically impossible. Further, claimed the commenter, if a URL is required to be indexed with an identification record, one URL (the site entrance) should be sufficient. In addition, the commenter commented, URLs outside the direct control of the content provider should not be covered under the regulations, and secondary producers should be permitted to simply list the producer's 2257 statement on the home page. The Department declines to adopt this comment.' That's exactly the question you asked."

08-04-2005, 08:40 AM
nap Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: midwest Posts: 2,765	Thanks for the link "You put your finger right on the question of the URLs," Cambria observed, "and your answer is on page 29617 of the Federal Register, which sets forth 28 CFR Part 75 [the new 2257 regulations], which begins on page 29607. In the section that's the Justice Department's 'Response to Public Comments on the Proposed Rule', there is the following language: 'One commenter commented that it is unclear whether a producer that provides content to a secondary producer must maintain a list of its URLs. According to the commenter, keeping such a list would be impossible, given the number of URLs and the fact that many URLs are generated dynamically, making the requirement technologically impossible. Further, claimed the commenter, if a URL is required to be indexed with an identification record, one URL (the site entrance) should be sufficient. In addition, the commenter commented, URLs outside the direct control of the content provider should not be covered under the regulations, and secondary producers should be permitted to simply list the producer's 2257 statement on the home page. The Department declines to adopt this comment.' That's exactly the question you asked."