Quote:
Originally Posted by phogirl69
I have a lot of respect for anyone that can go through law school. I have read some of the logics q's on the Law School Admissions Test and they are no fucken joke!! This is one example
-------------------------------
1. Bob did not eat a cream pie
2. Neither Hank nor Nancy's husband ate banana cream pie.
3. The three couples at table number one were Phil and his wife; Fran and her husband; and the man who had cherry cream pie
and his wife. At table number two were Dave and his wife, who is not Bonnie; and Kathleen and her husband. who did not eat apple pie.
4. Larry sat between Darla's husband (who did not eat a cream pie) and Hank.
The wives names are : Bonnie, Darla, Fran, Kathleen, Nancy
Husbands are: Bob, Dave, Hank, Larry, Phil
Types of pies are :
apple, banana cream, bluebery, cherry cream and peach cream
------------------
WTF?
And I have read some sample q's on law school exams on the net and those things are atrocious.
Just thinking about those type of q's make my head spin. You have to have very good reasoning and analytical skills to be a lawyer. If I had the brains I would go for it. But unfortunately I don't. I was researching law school and it what it was like in case I would ever want to do it one day, but it's just too difficult from what I have seen.
|
That took a little while. You should have added in the caveat that one pie was shared between each couple.
Bob's wife is Kathleen. They had Blueberry.
Dave's wife is Nancy. They had Peach Cream.
Hank's wife is Bonnie. They ate Cherry Cream.
Larry's wife is Fran. They had Banana Cream.
Phil's wife is Darla, and they had Apple.
... and now I'm hungry.
