GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

nicchick · 07-28-2005, 12:27 AM

The 2257 revisions were bad enough - but with the GOP controlling everything, it certainly wasn't surprizing. But now we have liberal democrats coming after us. All I saw on the tube today were "reports" that many adult sites were using phrases like "sleeping beauty" and "harry potter' to attract the 11-14 year olds to porn sites. Of course, while they mentioned that there were 420 million pages of porn on the net, that forgot to point out that 99.9%+ of the "pornographers" would never use those kind of tactics to get traffic.
The point is that we are in an indefensible position . The FSC does a great job but will never get a fair shot to make the correlation between free speech and porn. The writing is on the wall, guys. If you are an "Adult webmaster" in the USA, you had better have a back-up plan.

07-28-2005, 12:27 AM
nicchick Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 316	The industry is fucked in the USA The 2257 revisions were bad enough - but with the GOP controlling everything, it certainly wasn't surprizing. But now we have liberal democrats coming after us. All I saw on the tube today were "reports" that many adult sites were using phrases like "sleeping beauty" and "harry potter' to attract the 11-14 year olds to porn sites. Of course, while they mentioned that there were 420 million pages of porn on the net, that forgot to point out that 99.9%+ of the "pornographers" would never use those kind of tactics to get traffic. The point is that we are in an indefensible position . The FSC does a great job but will never get a fair shot to make the correlation between free speech and porn. The writing is on the wall, guys. If you are an "Adult webmaster" in the USA, you had better have a back-up plan.