Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bringer
i have a question. why do you blindly follow everything the government does and argue about how right it is. we all know the system isnt perfect, as i pointed out, yet you post paragraphs basically representing your position as "if the government says its ok, then it must be." if you read that article i posted, it basically shows how the supreme court expanded the governments power to play muscle for anyone with money and yet you argue its constitutional because the vote was 5-4 in favor? its only constitutional to 5 people in power while 4 disagree and even warn about the rulings possible outcome. i guess from now on ill use quotes showing whats true in the powers that governs eyes instead of what the actually document dictates.
|
I do not "blindly follow everything the government does and argue about how right it is."
I do not agree with many of the Supreme Court decisions or the legislation passed by the Congressional or the policies of the Executive branch.
In the case of the Supreme Court's decision to expand eminent domain to include proterties for private use...I deplore the decision (I never liked the original)...but the Court decided that it is within the Constitution and the majority court has always been the determiner of what is Constitutional and what is not. I am a pragmatist...not an idealist.