View Single Post
Old 07-20-2005, 07:57 AM  
spanky part 2
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,981
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
interesting how you keep twisting the fact to avoid answering the question

Exxon is not reaping hirer profits from higher oil prices, they are reaping higher profits because the demand for US oil is up because consumption by the US military is up.

Those profits would exist no matter which country was invaded.

So that statement is total bullshit and you know it

can you prove that iraq never had biological WMD because you know your answer would prove that George Bush did not lie.

Just to make it clear invading iraq did make the world a safer place, all you have to do is look at the number of UN inspection teams that have been getting the run around from country leaders (zero) and you can see the direct consequence of Bush going after sadam.

All those military leader fear the crazy american in the white house so they comply with the agreements instead of jerking the inspectors around.

Why don't you look up the profits of Exxon-Mobil. If you do, you will see a spike in profits beginning with the quarter after the war started.

Yeah we are a whole lot safer now. OMFG we are now breeding a whole new generation of terrorists. Were there any in Iraq before the war, no. Are they there now, yes.

We have been lucky up to this point. These terrorists think in decades, not years or months. It's a marathon for them and not a sprint.

Why don't you ask some Londoners if they are safer now or before the war.

You can't just attack a country unprovoked and expect everyone in that part of the world to cheer for you. We are acting imperialistic not democratic.

Who the fuck are we to tell other countries how to do things. We can't even get an honest election in this country. It has to be won in the supreme court.
spanky part 2 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote