Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spanky part 2
HANS BLIX: Well, they certainly advanced weapons of mass destruction as the decisive reason for going to war, and I think the evidence was rather weak at the time. We had heard in the autumn of 2002 that the alleged aluminum tubes, for instance, which were thought, alleged to be for making the centrifuges, were probably more likely to be for making a rocket. And in January 2003, we had performed quite a lot of inspections to sites which were given by intelligence and they had not shown any weapons of mass destruction, so we began to be doubtful.
From an interview with Jim Lehr
|
exactly what about
"the report commissioned to investigate the war determined that there never was chemical WMD, or Nuclear WMD (because sadam did not have the facilities to produce them) "
do you not understand
How does quoting a response to a question about CHEMICAL and NUCLEAR WMD not existing prove your point.