View Single Post
Old 07-18-2005, 08:17 PM  
spanky part 2
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,981
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
no just someone with enough brains to read the actual report instead of just blindly believing the spin of a democrat pundants who miss quoted the report as proof "that no WMD existed in iraq"
HANS BLIX: Well, they certainly advanced weapons of mass destruction as the decisive reason for going to war, and I think the evidence was rather weak at the time. We had heard in the autumn of 2002 that the alleged aluminum tubes, for instance, which were thought, alleged to be for making the centrifuges, were probably more likely to be for making a rocket. And in January 2003, we had performed quite a lot of inspections to sites which were given by intelligence and they had not shown any weapons of mass destruction, so we began to be doubtful.

From an interview with Jim Lehr
spanky part 2 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote