Quote:
|
Originally Posted by newbreed
No, I am not an attorney, but common sense prevails here with this new set of regs.
Now then...
"Now moving on.
We have had two prominent first amendment attorneys review our records and both have said that the online database alone is enough for compliance in our particular situation. "
Your lawyers need to keep up with the reality of the law as posted in the federal register as well as what the FSC lawyers are saying.
Want me to go on???
Point is, the solution you spoke was NOT COMPLIANT, so why should we not expose them?
|
Yeah I should listen to you instead of the pair of $350/hour attornies we hired. Ok, sure.
Also who are you exposing? Gen X law who now owns the program is not selling it, because the changes to it couldn't be made in order for it to be compliant in their opinion.
The only people you could possibly be exposing is the people who actually sold this software, MXdevelopment. Everyone who has read this thread now knows that they are crooks, so the only thing you're doing in here is trying to sell your shit by making Gen X look bad, when they've done nothing wrong.