|
Newbreed......first of all, you're not an attorney, and everyone's business is different, so you can't say for sure whether anyone is or isn't compliant.
Now moving on.
We have had two prominent first amendment attorneys review our records and both have said that the online database alone is enough for compliance in our particular situation.
Our situation being that of a non disclosed secondary producer, which is 100% permissible according to the new regulations. (If you don't know what that is, talk to your attorney)
However, IF we were a primary producer or a disclosed secondary producer we could still be compliant with this software, because it does export the records to a local .csv file.
That csv file on a hard drive along with digital copies of model id's and copies of the depictions is a scheme that can be 100% compliant with the new regs.
It may not be as easy as some other solutions out there, but it can still work.
What we were trying to hire MX to do was make this easier by being able to export the online data to a local access database, where the copies of the IDs could be located inside the database so everything was nice, neat, and in one place.
Like I said before, we're still compliant, it's just more of a pain in the ass the way it's being done now.
Obviously you're just in here trying to spam your shit and scaring people into thinking they're going to go to jail if they don't have your software. And you're bashing Gen X law who has yet to sell one copy of this software. You should back the fuck off and peddle your shit elsewhere.
__________________
sig too big
|