Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SexyScribe
And we're helping them.
That might work for the softer stuff, but where does that leave producers of hardcore or extreme or fetish content? Still lumped in with the pedos?
No. There has to be a line. A thick, black line, a divider. Between producers of legal pornography and criminals who engage in sexually violent acts on children.
My point is: You, simply by refusing to call it pornography, can affect a small and powerful change in the world. It requires no effort on your part. All it requires is that you make the choice to use a different word.
|
There is a line already, and one that is pretty damn obvious. We're on the right side, along with the producers of hardcore or extreme or fetish content (who I actually do lump in with adult entertainment, and thus with Playboy magazine, strip clubs, sexy stories, etc), while those who produce porn involving children are on the wrong side.
Refusing to call it pornography, however, will result in absolutely nothing, and will only be an ugly abuse of language. "Child obscenity" is almost as ugly as "African American"
But if you want to try and fight the phrase "child pornography", by all means, go right ahead. Let me know in a decade or so if you've had any success.