Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

Someone dared suggest above that the commonality of "arousal" situates [new term TBD] within the spectrum of "pornography".

It does NOT.

Some folks are fond of eating shit, that doesn't make it food.

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

The perception of any connection between our lawful business and an atrocious criminal depravity must be fought aggressively and vocally hereforward. We can suffer no equivocations or technicalities on this point -- no gray. I am concerned that in our desire to be of assistance to law enforcement, we have permitted a misunderstanding to take root. Law enforcement concerned with [new term TBD] should have been working shoulder-to-shoulder with this industry, availing themselves of our expertise. We should be standing with Law Enforcement, helping to point out the bad guys Instead, we have gone down a path of murky distinctions and undefended defintions, and now find ourselves the target of legal efforts to eliminate [new term TBD], when there is NO [new term TBD] here! Does no one find that outrageous? I do.
2HP