View Single Post
Old 07-11-2005, 09:20 PM  
SeniorX
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by abyss_al
"3. It lets you take it easy and focus on getting more out of the model, rather than your camera, during the shoot."

there's a diff between quality and quantity.... the less time you spend behind the computer fixing your pics so theyre 'perfect' the better... youre just doubling your work for no reason... i'd rather take one good shot then take 50 and sit there for hours picking out the best one and make them 'perfect'... the less you take the easier it is to pick the best shot....

and all this 'true photographers need to adapt and evolve' is a bunch of BS imo.... take a look at some of top pro's that I would bow to in their presense... they still use film and respect that more than anything... ansel adams, jerry ulesman...etc.... if you think these guys grow their ego's than you have much much much to learn...

Are you telling me that all your photos are perfect enough not to do any work on them in photoshop afterwards?

No offence, but naming photographers and them using/respecting film just makes you a sheep. It's like saying: "Eat shit - 500 million flies can't be wrong!".
SeniorX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote