Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SexyScribe
Regardless of the disturbing factor, bukkake and other genres of pornographic content are performed by consenting adults, or at least, adults who have the ability to consent.
Situations that involve children, minors, and those unable to form consent are exploitive. Not the same.
And, as I mentioned.. it WOULD be considered pornographic by those who derive pleasure from it. But by calling yourself a pornographer, AND calling CP "pornography" you're (albeit perhaps unwillingly) making yourself part of that group. Doesn't matter if *you* know the difference, the fact is that general society doesn't.
What annoys you is the way it's "portrayed as if it were part of the regular pornography business" and yet you argue about changing the usage of the word? Who do you think is going to portray it differently for you?
It's naive to think that such a change would be easy.
It's also naive to think that we don't have the power to make the change occur.
|
I see what you're saying about consent and whatnot, and how child porn differs from porn involving consenting adults. But there is one blindingly obvious similarity; the intent is to arouse the viewer. They are both types of pornography.
I'll tell you the one thing i like about your idea to call it Child Exploitation/Violation or something along those lines. It would sort of increase the scope of what it would include. Child pornography is unfortunately overly specific. A lot of stuff that i personally feel should be considered pornographic is not, but who knows, maybe it would be considered exploitation.