Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SexyScribe
Calling it CP only validates that it IS pornography.
Let's call a spade a spade.
It's child obscenity, or child exploitation, (or any other word that more accurately denotes what we're referring to). But it is NOT pornography.
Correction... it's ONLY considered pornography to the people who derive pleasure from it.
Now... do we really want to be lumped in to THAT category?
|
Uhm, no. It is child pornography. It is called child pornography because it is a type of pornogrpahy. It doesn't matter who derives the pleasure from it, it's intent is to derive sexual pleasure from the viewer, and therefore it is pornographic.
That's like saying Bukkake isn't pornographic because it's rather disturbing and a lot of people wouldn't derive any pleasure from it. Call a spade a spade, indeed. Child pornography is a type of pornography, and that is why the term will persist.
What annoys me is the way that it is portrayed as if it were part of the regular pornography business, but this will be the case regardless of what name it is given. It's rather naive to think otherwise, in my opinion.