|
More traffic = more bandwidth = higher expenses. It's not like I can know in advance if the traffic converts well, and I don't want to get hit with empty traffic because I offered a high payout.
I mean, I do get what you are saying. This is just the counterpoint. My real question is, even given all that you have said, is it really reasonable that the standard is now "the referrer should make more than the provider"?
I would say that's a pretty sad sign of how corporate porn is getting. I mean, I'm not the only person on this list who makes his own content, am I? This must seem a little odd to other people. Shouldn't the money in a creative industry be going to creative people, too?
That said, I am glad to offer 50% to anyone who can sent good traffic... I'd even take a shot and say I'd offer it based on *lots* of traffic (there is a difference) coming from people from GFY. Any takers? My sites are unique niche sites that convert well if sent good traffic.
|