Quote:
|
Originally Posted by J B
John,
I don't take this to a personal level. I just pointed out that some of your statements are false. Also, you mentioned StatsRemote in a few of your posts before and you were spamming your product in threads where people asked about StatsRemote or RevStats. This is something the RevStats guys and we have never done for a very good reason  |
You did take this to a personal level...that's very clear in your post.
Your 'scanning tomorrow's statement...where you've been doing it all along is certainly up for debate...just because it's clumped in to the total numbers isn't much of an argument...it certainly isn't out of left field that I would advertise having this capability being brand new on the market and it obviously appealed to people...and to you apparently as you later added it.
I can understand why you are concerned...you have successfully cornered the market for years and it's painfully obvious there was a need for something like this...and my 'false advertising' and thread selections certainly aren't the reason for it's success...
You came into this thread pushing the persona of not having to respond directly to it or me ect (which would have been an admirable stance)...and I wasn't going to enter it either...obviously the people in the thread are webmaster's using both software...
...so let the webmasters decide and leave this worthless crap out of it...I am really not concerned with what you and revstats have considered to be acceptable advertising/marketing strategies over the years...and I'm certainly not lying to webmasters...you personality sure flipped quickly here...act like a business man and drop this crap...