Originally Posted by dopeman

i think people here are worried about his views toward the adult industry. he has made comments about cracking down on obscenity, but it isn't quite clear exactly how he feels about the 2257 case. remember, the regs were already written when he was named AG, and he basically inherited 2257 from ashcroft. ashcroft was forced to start enforcing 2257 by congress when they passed the Protect act.

but interestingly enough, in the Protect act congress didn't change the 'secondary producer' language that was argued successfully by the FSC in the Sundance case. i really don't see how the DOJ can just ignore the sundance ruling. they didn't appeal the case - they just fucking ignored it.