Quote:
|
Originally Posted by directfiesta
Let me analyse this ... Overload... Overload ... Danger ... Overload ... Can't comprehend...Overload... OVERLOAD... POUFFFFF !!!!!
Proof against Sadaam was much more credible ... 
ISRAEL HAS WMD... END OF DISCUSSION... |
I'm glad you've reached an orgasm..
no, proof against saddam wasn't credible, and i don't see why you're involving this. our discussion was about israel.
and now you're probably thinking "so why doesn't anyone invade israel, if there is a good probability that it has wmd?"
well, that's because of the common sense reason i was talking about earlier.
israel having wmd = ok
extrimist muslims having them = bad