Quote:
|
Originally Posted by uno
LOL as a guy who does sales for a merchant services company I understand that. Let's see how long a ban lasts on porn after the closeted repub porn freaks can't get their fix of the newest light speed girl. It's not something they CAN do as its already been ruled against. Case precidence man. They can try but it will and should be shot down by either an appellate court or the Supremes.
|
Yea.. smell it may well be a matter of being shot down. The arguements for child protection/killing CP have got to be the weakest load of trash ever written.
This concern for children is amazingly hypocritical since it offering nothing more for children and since the inception of the original 2257 they have never got off there asses once and instigated any action under this code - the track record sums up the "concern for children".
It's little more than a book-keeping/record-keeping exercise to log details of 30 something MILF's with big tits who are clearly well over 18. You may recognize a 30 year old MILF - I may recognize a 30 year old MILF, - but the legislature obvious does not. And law enforcement will be too busy looking at her tits to notice much else - so what hope :-)
Weirdest of the lot is there is a jail sentence for "failing to keep records" - ie.. not that there need to be any CP, - the "crime" is failing to keep records :-)