Quote:
|
Originally Posted by eroswebmaster
I'm taking non-nude images from hardcore sets and linking them via text to the FHG.
If that gets me tossed in jail then so be it and I'll fight it like a mother fucker...because at that point I'm already in shackles.
Talking this over with TheDoc he brought up a very valid point.
The DOJ wants to make a solid case, not something that can be locked up and argued for years.. They are in business to win, to become judges and politicians, not lose on stupid crap like that.
So with that in mind, I don't believe they will be targetting people who are linking non-nude images to sites with explicit content on them, or to bust people with text links.
|
That's exactly what I'm doing; I grabbed all new images, cropped a thumb from them while saving the original I have. I can't prove the original image I grabbed, though, wasn't cropped from a larger image that had explicit content in it.
So in the end, and until there's cases won / lost in court, nobody knows dick, including the most high-priced lawyer firms. The only "good" advice I've heard from lawyers and anyone else is have your documents in line and all t's crossed, i's dotted or be as safe as possible with any non-sexually explicit image you physically place or link to on your website.