View Single Post
Old 06-25-2005, 12:48 PM  
- Jesus Christ -
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ::::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: ::::::||||||||||||:::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::
Posts: 7,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus
Are you seriously comparing McCarthyism and the Holocaust to 2257??!!

Get a grip and grasp a place in reality. No one is saying you cant look at or distribute pornographic images, just have to have proper documentation for it. Thats not outrageous. It should have been required 10 years ago, but adult webmasters have been left to police themselves and have failed miserably at it. Again, there is a reason why real free speech organizations such as the ACLU has not stepped in to fight this fight. Because its not a free speech issue. Its a trade regulations issue.
Its called sarcasm moron.
__________________

Amen
- Jesus Christ - is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote