Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Matt 26z
Most of the lawyers are saying to play it safe and have model ID's on hand even if you cropped it, and that's definitely the absolute zero-risk method. Which is what people generally pay lawyers to give out.
I am not sweating this at all though, and here is an example why.
Assume photos that show people standing next to a bird are illegal.
If you were to take a photo of me standing next to a bird, that photo would contain a visual depiction of me standing next to a bird. Totally illegal.
But if you were to chop the photo afterwords so that it's just me, is it still a visual depiction of me standing next to a bird? No, because you can not have a visual depiction of something YOU CANT SEE in the photo.
To me this is all just common sense.
|
Bad argument. Then would the thumbnail actually lead to a full-size pic that includes the bird? Under your argument all the thumbnails cropped to not show sexual action would have to be going to go to full-size pics not showing sexual action.