Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DatingGold
Originally your post said that they agree not to inspect anyone until the next hearing, then you changed it to just say FSC members. I just find it very interesting how the post was edited.
Why doesn't the FSC post the actual documents. It was originally stated that there was a 2257 injunction overall, not just for plaintiffs and FSC members.
|
I thought the same thing so I went to the 10th circuit court website... ennrolled in the PACE online document system.. got the docs & uploaded them to one of my servers:
Document 1:
HEARING ON TERMS OF STIPULATION
Document 2:
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
ALSO
Here is
Exhibit A that the DOJ is using against the FSC. You know.. the FSC attorney making statements on the site that the FSC doesn't endorse relying on Sundance for protection.. something of that nature.