Quote:
|
Originally Posted by will76
1. because there was NO INJUNCTION. There was an agreement between the FSC and PLAINTIFFS not to prosecute and to review the issue in a couple months.
2. the next sentence that you conviently left out from you quote: " At no time will the DoJ have direct access to the FSC membership list, which will remain under seal. "
If you trusted them enough to join up and fight for you then trust them that your info will not be given out. If you don't trust them then hire your own attorney or STFU ;)
|
well tickle my pickle and call me willy
Then why the hell post that no one will be touched in the first place.
If your laywer tell you he's goona get you probation and comes back with 18 months prison time would you be pissed?
And yes the memberslist has been given out.
"A master list of members will be submitted to the Special Master on Wednesday June 29, 2005, and will include all FSC members as of 2:00 p.m. pacific standard time, Saturday June 25, 2005."
I dont care if its to the doj, ronald mcdonald or my great grandmother. If anyone besides the fsc has a copy of the members list it has been handed out.
Now how the hell can you support someone who goes back on there word?
Please tell me how. I am having a hard time grasping this......