Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GatorB
So? I said this was the umpteenth thread about FSC whiners. I didn't say YOU made all of those threads. You have something to say chocker didn't already?
Seems like they are trying to help their wallet. That's just my opinion. the government was willingot deal what does that tell yuo? Hmmm they knew they would lose. So why deal? Get the injunction. Also you deal from a posistion of STENGTH and the FSC had it and they got a shitty deal. Also Anyone that claims they are "helping" me but is willing to feed me to the feds if I don't fork over cash to them is not my firend now are they?
|
I don't give a shit about other post, show me how many of the other posts brought up the points that i did. You complain about me "posting" period. I complain about an issue and back it up with facts why the people shouldn't be complaining. Sounds like your complaining just to complain.
to answer the second part of your post:
The FSC felt they had a good case, but where they 100% confident? Hell no. They might have had a great "game face" on, but I bet you none of them felt it was a "LOCK". They had, how long a month or two to prepare. Then went in to yesterday prepared for a fight, they were confident, BUT you never know how courts will rule. An extention is not a loss. It's small victory. They bought more time to prepare. The smart (and safe) thing to do it to take the extra time, and not risk walking out a loser. Keep puting it off and give yourself more time to build an even stronger case.
If they would have turned down the offer and lost, you guys would have wanted to hang them for doing that.