View Single Post
Old 06-23-2005, 07:11 PM  
baycouples
Confirmed User
 
baycouples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,341
Today's deal - anybody else thinks they could have done better?

The judge in this case is a Clinton appointed judge and the case is in the same district where the previous case killed part of the 2257. The TRO is not that hard to get in this case with this judge. So, is it just me or did the lawyers on "our side" did a really sitty job?

I mean you do realize that if the TRO is never granted or granted and then lifted - all of us ( even the FSC members ) are still responsible for the content we put up from today and on?

I say this was a big defeat for the FSC. Am I wrong?
baycouples is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote