GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

sixzeros · 06-23-2005, 05:25 PM

A ton of questions...

(make sure to turn off your adult filtering)
http://images.google.com/images?biw=...ck&btnG=Search

http://images.search.yahoo.com/searc...&p=Hilary+Duff

http://search.lycos.com/default.asp?...lti&cat=images

http://www.altavista.com/image/resul...iwxh=all&dis=1

http://search.msn.com/images/results...ORM=MSNH&q=sex

None of these sites seem to give a damn that they have explicit preview images on their servers, if they are non 2257 compliant then I wonder what their plan is to deal with it?

And why would a thumb TGP be any different than any other image based search engine? Is there a loophole that we're not seeing?

Where are these companies in the fight?

And if we patch Comus with the following 2257 update to allow webmasters to remove explicit thumbs and replace them with placemarkers... As on the following Beta sites, would this be enough?
http://xxxonfire.com/index.shtml
http://xxxonice.com/

Is there anything else I should add?

And what the hell is explicit anyway?
Are Tits to be considered explicit? Do nipples make a difference?
Are Toys when not displayed next to genitals considered explicit?
Are panties and thongs considered explicit?

Thanks for your input - Sixzeros.
-----------------------
Comus Thumbs
Beta testers needed for the new Comus 2257 Upgrade.
Features bulk review, built in censorship, alternate thumbnails, explicit ratings.
2257 URL database, sponsor hosted gallery manager, 404 scanner.

06-23-2005, 05:25 PM
sixzeros Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 53	Are these sites 2257 compliant? A ton of questions... (make sure to turn off your adult filtering) http://images.google.com/images?biw=...ck&btnG=Search http://images.search.yahoo.com/searc...&p=Hilary+Duff http://search.lycos.com/default.asp?...lti&cat=images http://www.altavista.com/image/resul...iwxh=all&dis=1 http://search.msn.com/images/results...ORM=MSNH&q=sex None of these sites seem to give a damn that they have explicit preview images on their servers, if they are non 2257 compliant then I wonder what their plan is to deal with it? And why would a thumb TGP be any different than any other image based search engine? Is there a loophole that we're not seeing? Where are these companies in the fight? And if we patch Comus with the following 2257 update to allow webmasters to remove explicit thumbs and replace them with placemarkers... As on the following Beta sites, would this be enough? http://xxxonfire.com/index.shtml http://xxxonice.com/ Is there anything else I should add? And what the hell is explicit anyway? Are Tits to be considered explicit? Do nipples make a difference? Are Toys when not displayed next to genitals considered explicit? Are panties and thongs considered explicit? Thanks for your input - Sixzeros. ----------------------- Comus Thumbs Beta testers needed for the new Comus 2257 Upgrade. Features bulk review, built in censorship, alternate thumbnails, explicit ratings. 2257 URL database, sponsor hosted gallery manager, 404 scanner.