View Single Post
Old 06-23-2005, 02:55 AM  
chadglni
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PEI, Canada
Posts: 6,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
The DOJ has a history of going after people they think they can win a case against. These lawyers want to be judges and politicians later on, to do that they need to win cases. If I had content up that wasn?t compliant and I took it down to be compliant, they can?t charge me for anything. The US Gov can?t retroactively enforce the law (that?s US law). Going after people that are compliant now but weren?t compliant 3 months ago will not stand up in court.

And yes, I think they are going after people that are producing, displaying, and distributing CP. Once they are done taking down the real problems they may start to inspect compliant companies. Which is fine. They have a huge amount of CP being produced that they want to stop. Just look at Yahoo?s CP case. Or newsgroups, p2p networks, and the people like the NY guy that was producing CP.
Retroactive isn't the right word considering the laws have been on the books since BEFORE 1995. The DOJ says they reject Sundance and companies have been illegal all along.
chadglni is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote