Quote:
|
Originally Posted by J$tyle$
... if records kept prior were in accordance with previous regs
Still a ton of other stuff to deal with BUT I'm sure that takes a load off a lot of webmaster's minds!
|
Yes, I saw that right away with great relief
HOWEVER....many US adult lawyers, including mine, say that the possible DOJ interpretation going forward is that if you publish anything on a US website, you are still "A PRODUCER" and you could be prohibited from using content shot overseas by overseas companies using overseas talent.
It doesn't say anything in the new 2257 that only primary producers must be located outside the US to use foreign talent --- it just refers to producers *required to maintain records* --- and the DOJ views secondary producers as producers required to maintain records as well....that's why we've all been scrambling, because we're required to maintain those records.
That's admittedly the most severe reading of the new 2257, but does anyone really think that the DOJ will take a reasonable approach to anything? I hope this reading is wrong, but until it's shown that post-June 23 content can be shot overseas and used on US websites, I'm only using US-shot content from this point on....
