Originally Posted by ronaldo

Jesus, what utter bullshit. I only read three paragraphs and could see where it was headed.

Whenever a reference is made to defend their position, it immediately refers to child porn.

However, whenever a reference is made to the ESTABLISHMENT questioning the regulations, it's simply, "The pornography industy."

Example-

"Moreover, the harm to the government and the public interest from a temporary restraining order would dwarf any claimed harm to the pornography industry that would result from a denial. A temporary restraining order would greatly increase the likelihood of the distribution of child pornography during this period..."

Right. They make it sound like the child pornography distributers are sitting on the edge of their seats at this moment hoping for a restraining order or else they'll have to cease distribution. Please.