View Single Post
Old 06-19-2005, 06:11 PM  
Kre8t0r
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: From Hurricane Hell to Frozen Hell
Posts: 1,302
Quote:
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent
Since the efforts to have ASACP Advisory council to review its neutral position has gone so well, might i suggest harnessing that same energy to address the following:


lenman's support for .xxx
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...5&page=1&pp=50

thread titled '.xxx the best way to stop censorship'

"Think about it. If adult content was on it's own TLD, it's easy to block it for kids. No major isp is going to block it, because they'd lose 20% of their customers. And people that want porn will have the power to see it.

I'd rather have that than have the US gov't try to prosecute people......"

------------------------------------

the companies mentioned in Greg Dumas' post to ICANN:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/stld-rfp-xxx/msg00056.html

".....I have personally met with many of the leaders in the online adult community from around the world ... from Python Communications in Curacao ... to Netcollex in the UK ... to Hustler, Vivid, AVN and many many more have all demonstrated their support for this application. ....."


--------------------------------------

larry walters letter to ICANN in support of .xxx:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/stld-rfp-xxx/msg00003.html

"... For the good of the adult Internet industry, this proposal should be approved."

All 3 of those comments and the people that made them shocked me when they were made and I still can't understand the logic.. .xxx is a bad idea no matter how you want to look for the silver lining...
Kre8t0r is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote