|
The point is correct. If you have been posting explicit content since 1995 you need the docs. If you relied on Sundance the DOJ is saying too bad, we do not accept the ruling. Unless you happen to live in the 10th circuit Sundance is not law for you and even if you do I would not put my faith in the ruling.
Sponsors have a problem if they disributed explict content since 1995 and will not provide documentation, affiliates also have a problem. The key and as of yet unanswered question is how DOJ plans to waste it's assets enforcing these rules.
If used as Congress intended they would only visit people who post images that might be underage; however this is the BUSH administration and this provides a wonderful tool to harrass the entire industry. It is much easier to jail you, or just offer you a plea to shut down, for not having the correct records than to prove any real crime.
Sorry guys, I worked a prosecutor for a short while and they will use any weapon at their disposal to get a conviction.
|