Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2HousePlague
good observation -- you have to wonder why there would be no consumer-directed PR/communications element, if the public benefits of 2257 are so self-evident -- hell, why not call it "traci's law" and go on 60 minutes -- why not?
because the adult entertainment industry is NOT a victimizer of minors -- look at our record. if the DOJ tried to make a case (on the public stage) for our wrongdoing as regards minors, the true (censorial) intent of 2257 would become apparent -- and the american public has shown little historical interest in censorship legislation when it is unglamourized by a celebrity body part -- 
2HP
|
Yeah, I'm a bit surprised that the News hasn't ran with it more. I guess all of their time was taken with Michael Jackson and the missing girl in Aruba. I just don't want to see a negative shit storm start, with all of the usual characters caught with their pants down (the Rob Blacks, Ron Jeremys, Jenna Jamesons, Sharon Mitchells, Mary Careys,etc, etc).
I hear all press is good press. I don't think it will be the case for this. It would be an unfair drinking game to 'drink' everytime the Adult Business and CP are mentioned together in the same report.