Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dopeman
well that's about prosecuting obsenity cases. 2257 is about record keeping. but in terms of 2257, i think they'll go after small, new guys. they know the big guys are lawyered up and probably compliant. they also know an injunction could be granted, so they just want the headlines of mass inspections and arrests even if those prosecutions are later thrown out in case of an injunction. this is all a fucking game to these pathetic bastards who are trying to show the religious right they are cracking down on porn.
good find though. thanks for posting it.
|
Right I think that they'll be using the 2257 to help prosecute obscenity because of the dismal statistics stated in this report. It's amazing that about 1/2 of the cases weren't even brought to court because there was no evidence... so in essence.. they went to prosecute some poor innocent people who they had no evidence for!
So with the new 2257... all they need to prosecute is see that a site doesn't have the section 18 warning and they're set.. automatic guilt and automatic reason to investigate them for other stuff.
What's your take?