06-18-2005, 07:14 AM
|
|
|
CURATOR
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: the attic
Posts: 14,572
|
good observation -- you have to wonder why there would be no consumer-directed PR/communications element, if the public benefits of 2257 are so self-evident -- hell, why not call it "traci's law" and go on 60 minutes -- why not?
because the adult entertainment industry is NOT a victimizer of minors -- look at our record. if the DOJ tried to make a case (on the public stage) for our wrongdoing as regards minors, the true (censorial) intent of 2257 would become apparent -- and the american public has shown little historical interest in censorship legislation when it is unglamourized by a celebrity body part --
2HP
__________________
tada!
|
|
|