Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AaronM
Once again you show your stupidity on this issue.
FYI, Over the last 2+ days, I have spent multiple hours discussing 2257 with well qualified attorneys and THEY are the ones who mentioned this to me.
If you read the DOJ's comments on the 1995 retroactive thing, they specifically state that you should have been doing things their way all along and if you had a better understanding of the current regs then you would know this.
|
I understand them just fine. How come these are NEW rules if they have existed since 1995? The 1995 thing is about the CONTENT. Meaning any CONTENT made after July 3,1995 falls under 2257. Show me where the SECONDARY producer requirement has existed since 1995? I fact under Sundance is not suppose to exist at all. Also show me how the DOJ could even prove that say in 1998 you didn't have a 2257 statement on your website? I mean unless you never updated it. That's just retarded. I think the DOJ has enough people to go after that are currently running websites than to chase after ghosts.
Fact is the REAL purpose of the DOJ is to have as many of us shut down as possible. Now IF I do and I can still be busted then what's my motivation for shutting down? If I haven't been complying and because of that I can still get busted what my motivation for complying now? See that doesn't make any sense.
If I am wrong, I will personally cut off both my balls if ANYONE is ever convicted of violating these new 2257 rules beause of a website they ran that went offline before June 23, 2005