View Single Post
Old 06-16-2005, 10:15 AM  
TheShark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Braincash Fred
It seems that to be compliant, secondary producers are required to have the IDs & releases at their place of business. The question of remote server with IDs have been asked at the free speech coalition meeting today and all lawyers agreed that a remote server from a 3th party, can't be considered as your place of business. They compared this as doing business with a dentist or a doctor and assuming that you can use their office as your place of business. The 3 lawyers there concluded it was not a possible solution and that anyone who would recommend something like this is running into some serious troubles.
Maybe they should re-read the regulations...
__________________
DISCLAIMER: I am not giving you legal advice, and there is no attorney-client relationship established between us as a result of this writing. You should seek the advice of an attorney in your area for any legal questions you may have.

Rob Apgood
www.adultlaw.com
"We eat what we kill"
TheShark is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote