|
"sort of. See the DOJ has no authority to write new law that oversteps a previous courts ruling. "
you are correct, sir. But of course, if the sundance case sticks, then the whole secondary producer thing is out the window anyway, making this a moot discussion.. ie: boneprone will be able to use that content w/o having to hold records
so either way, that content should end up useable.. just a matter of when it would actually get compliant for the secondary, or when the notion of "secondary producer" goes kaput
|