Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SykkBoy2
same here, but some people are blinded to their own prejudices and too much exposure to media attention to the trial
|
nope. here is a case where the prosecution was extremely inept and the accuser's family, especially the mother, were unimpressive on the witness stand to say the least........in fact, his mother came off as borderline........then there is the fact of the JC Penny scam this family ran....
its not clearly as the OJ Simpson case was.........with a dim-witted jury who chose to ignore the mountain of scientific DNA evidence without logically figuring out that a conspiracy of multiple LAPD cops was impossible, given timelines and whatnot.......
this was a case of a brilliant defense attorney outmaneuvering an inept prosecution team.........once again, money buys talent and thats why defense attorneys are usually much better attorneys, as thats where the real dough is. that combined with a terrible family for the prosecution doomed this case.
however, i point out..........michael jackson bought his off the last one over ten years ago........he paid out over $12 Million because he knew if he didn't, he'd go down in flames. he was guilty then, and perhaps now.
one thing is for sure, this man has a problem with boys, and is a pederast.